Hungry herbivores, fungal diseases and long hot summers are just a few of the challenges land managers face when attempting to re-introduce a threatened
plant species. But the biggest challenge of all may lie in calculating whether a reintroduction program has been successful.
“When we reintroduce a threatened plant species, we do so with the goal of creating a viable population that will be self-sustaining into the future,” says project leader Dr David Coates, from the Department of Parks and Wildlife, WA.
“The aim of our project [Project 4.3] is to examine the methods we use in our programs, in order to improve our success rates.”
Dr Coates and his team face a series of inter-related problems that begin with the challenges of propagation.
“Some of these species require unusual techniques to get them going, for example we need to use fire to extract the seeds from banksia cones.
“Sometimes seeds don’t propagate easily, either due to the specific soil mix or the difficulty of creating the right conditions. And other times we just don’t know why a particular species struggles to get going.
“We must always remain conscious that in the case of particularly rare species, we don’t have large amounts of seed to begin with, so we need to be very careful. Our margin for error is small.”
Even if the propagation is successful, the team must work to find a suitable habitat to reintroduce the young plants, and ensure there are no immediate threats.
“In Western Australia we are always on the lookout for dieback, which is an introduced pathogen and devastating soil-borne fungal disease. For the most part we can’t really combat it, other than by preventing access by people to affected areas to minimise its spread,” says Dr Coates.
“Both feral and native animal grazing are also threats, they are typically curious about our activities and have a taste for young seedlings. If we don’t fence them out, they will eat everything.
“We also need to keep an eye on the weather. Long hot summers can quickly undo all of our hard work and initial watering may be needed to assist establishment.”
In order to achieve the ultimate goal - a self-sustaining and viable population, a critical number of plants must survive to reproductive maturity.
“This will be a major focus of our research, looking at ways we can both measure and model levels of pollination, reproduction, recruitment and genetic variation. This will be challenging in some cases where the lifespan of a number of the shrubs and trees will usually outlast the lifespan of any given project.”
“We can then benchmark these results against natural populations.”
“It’s essentially a numbers game, where we need to discover how many plants need to be established in order to ensure a species’ survival. At the moment we aim for at least 250, but depending on the species, we may need many more.”
“Our research aims to provide the answers to these questions.”
Image: Lambertia orbifolia - Round-leaf Honeysuckle by Tatters/Flickr (CC BY-NC 2.0)
Focusing on the rate and magnitude of species declines can miss important aspects about why species are declining, but this information could be crucial for effective management.
Dr Damian Michael has worked with over 500 landholders to help conserve threatened species and ecological communities. He talks about his upbringing, career and the satisfaction he gets from working with farming communities and volunteer groups.
While a $213,000 nest box program failed the threatened species it was designed to attract, there is much we can learn from it to improve future offset policy and projects.
New research, just published in Journal of Mammalogy, has observed a dramatic increase in feral predators after a prescribed burn in Victoria’s Otway Ranges.
Will Batson explains why a bettong in the bush is worth two in the hand; the successful reintroduction of bettongs within two predator-free fenced nature reserves in the ACT; and a new project to establish bettongs outside fenced reserves.