Experienced practitioners from diverse organisations came together to discuss threatened species monitoring at the workshop entitled ‘Enhancing Monitoring
for Threatened Species to Improve Conservation Outcomes.’
Government, NGO, community group and university representatives presented case studies, the insights from which helped shape lively discussion around the decisions, processes and challenges of threatened species monitoring.
Participants unanimously agreed that monitoring is an essential part of threatened species recovery; however, they asked why threatened species monitoring is rarely carried out, and why, when it is carried out, is it rarely effective in terms of positively affecting conservation outcomes?
Discussion revolved around solutions to this problem, including the potential for new technologies (drones, thermal cameras) to aid with monitoring design, the value of citizen science, and the contribution of Indigenous groups to threatened species monitoring.
One of the insights from the workshop was the need to include people at all stages of monitoring design and application. Hub researcher, Natasha Robinson, from the Australian National University observed that “to improve threatened species conservation we need people to engage with and value threatened species monitoring.”
“Practitioners need to demonstrate the value of on-going monitoring through reporting on our successes (and failures), and to engage with a broad range of people – from community, to land managers, to Indigenous people, to funding bodies and government.
“Without support from these different groups, monitoring is at risk of not being integrated into decision making and on ground management, and therefore not contributing to positive conservation outcomes.”
On-ground threatened species conservation will be assisted by practical guidelines - under development as part of this project - that aim to enhance the effectiveness of threatened species monitoring. See more information.
Image: Long-term monitoring of threatened species comes with its challenges (image supplied by Natasha Robinson)
The world is changing. Some of this change is planned and desirable. But much else is an unwanted consequence of the expansion of the human species. Those unwanted impacts will affect our lives and those of our descendants.
After undergraduate majors in Geography, Environmental Science and Botany, I did my PhD on native grasslands. I was struck by how these Critically Endangered ecosystems existing right on the edge of my city were being lost without most people even knowing about them – or understanding what amazing, super diverse ecosystems they are.
What influences where birds choose to nest? About 15% of Australian birds, or 114 species, need tree hollows for breeding or shelter. The number of hollow-bearing trees is declining due to timber harvesting and development.
Fish need to move to find food, escape predators and reach suitable habitat for reproduction. Dams, weirs and culverts can create barriers that fragment habitats, isolating fish populations. An Australian innovation, however, promises to help dwindling fish populations in Australia and worldwide.
Endangered forty-spotted pardalote nestlings are falling prey to the larvae of a blood-feeding fly parasite. Researcher Fernanda Alves, reports on experiments that encourage forty-spotted pardalotes to ‘self-fumigate’ their nests by incorporating chicken feathers treated with a bird-safe insecticide.